Back to Evidence
Annual Literature Review

2022
in Review

Dr. Irshad’s selection of the most practice-changing publications from 2022, across foregut surgery, esophageal cancer, and lung cancer.

2022
That year in medicineSurgeons performed the first transplant of a genetically modified pig heart into a person — a landmark moment for organ transplantation.
Benign Esophageal Surgery
Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery for chronic GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis of 20-year data
Gut — 2022

A comprehensive meta-analysis of 28 studies and over 4,000 patients confirmed that laparoscopic fundoplication achieves durable symptom control in 80–90% of patients at 10 years, with 60–70% remaining off PPIs at long-term follow-up. Reoperation rates were low (5–8%) and quality of life scores significantly exceeded those of patients on continuous medical therapy.

Key takeawayAt 10 years, most surgical patients are still off antacid medication — surgery provides durable relief that pills cannot match.
Laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair: impact of surgical volume on outcomes
Surgical Endoscopy — 2022

A national database analysis demonstrated a strong inverse relationship between surgeon volume and morbidity in giant paraesophageal hernia repair — high-volume surgeons (>20 cases/year) had significantly lower conversion rates (4% vs. 14%), shorter hospital stays, and fewer major complications. The findings reinforced the importance of referral to experienced centres for complex hernia repair.

Key takeawayFor complex hernia surgery, volume matters — outcomes are dramatically better in high-volume hands.
Esophageal Cancer Surgery
KEYNOTE-590: pembrolizumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment for esophageal cancer — updated survival data
Annals of Oncology — 2022

Updated analysis of the KEYNOTE-590 trial confirmed that adding pembrolizumab (immunotherapy) to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in advanced esophageal cancer (median OS 12.4 vs. 9.8 months; HR 0.73). The benefit was most pronounced in PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumours, shaping the standard of care for patients presenting with unresectable or metastatic disease.

Key takeawayImmunotherapy has become standard in advanced esophageal cancer — understanding PD-L1 status now guides first-line treatment decisions.
FLOT4 trial: 5-year survival outcomes of perioperative FLOT vs. ECF/ECX chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer
Lancet Oncology — 2022

Five-year follow-up of the FLOT4 trial confirmed the survival advantage of perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) over ECF/ECX for resectable gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma (5-year OS 45% vs. 36%). FLOT is now the standard perioperative regimen at most high-volume centres.

Key takeawayFLOT chemotherapy before and after surgery improves 5-year survival by 9 percentage points — a meaningful gain in a difficult cancer.
Lung Cancer Surgery
CheckMate 816: neoadjuvant nivolumab + chemotherapy before surgery for resectable NSCLC — primary results
New England Journal of Medicine — 2022

The landmark CheckMate 816 phase III trial demonstrated that adding nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for stage IB–IIIA NSCLC significantly improved pathological complete response (24% vs. 2.2%) and event-free survival (31.6 vs. 20.8 months). The trial established immunotherapy + chemotherapy as the new standard pre-operative regimen for resectable lung cancer.

Key takeawayA landmark trial that changed practice globally: immunotherapy before lung cancer surgery is now standard of care.
Robotic vs. VATS lobectomy for NSCLC: propensity-matched analysis of 8,000+ cases
Journal of Thoracic Oncology — 2022

A propensity-matched analysis of 8,400 patients from a national thoracic surgery database found robotic lobectomy was associated with lower conversion rates to open thoracotomy (2.3% vs. 5.1%), reduced blood transfusion requirements, and shorter length of stay compared to VATS, with equivalent 30-day mortality and oncologic lymph node yield.

Key takeawayAt scale, robotic surgery is safer than VATS for lung resection — half the open conversion rate, less blood loss, shorter stay.